Americans will challenge 'Obama-care' and public option
Mihir Oza
Issue date: 8/28/09 Section: Ed-Op
|
Many factors play into this and it is not all that serious since public polls can be volatile. However, the Obama administration's recent backing away from a public health-insurance option- a campaign promise that placed the Democrats of our country under his spell, has culminated into much debate over the past few weeks. Instead of a public-option, the White House "facing increasing skepticism over President Obama's call for a public insurance plan to compete with the private sector … would consider a proposal for a nonprofit health cooperative," according to New York Times columnist Sheryl Gay Stolberg.
The liberal democrats are obviously stunned by this change in events. However, Obama had his reasons - most of which he spurred into heated discussions at town-hall-style meetings across the country this month. First off, this will ease the private health care companies worried about the dangers of the almighty government competitor. Additionally this could punch a hole in the Republican concerns about a "government takeover."
The Republicans possess good arguments against the public plan. Stolberg said they fear that it would "invariably drive private insurers out of business and prompt employers to drop private coverage." This will than cause an influx of once insured people onto a governmental plan. To avoid such a vicious cycle has kept the Republicans at bay with such a plan.
But the person taking most of the heat from these talks is Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. During a recent CNN interview she said "that the president's main concern was to promote competition with the private sector," when asked whether an alternative to a public option was propagated. In a recent Wall Street Journal article, "leaders of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and Congressional Black Caucus sent her a letter" in protest saying "we stand in strong opposition to your statement that the public option is 'not the essential element' of comprehensive reform.'"




Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
Florida Resident
posted 8/28/09 @ 9:19 PM EST
How utterly small minded can the general public be?
Still believing the "hogwash" of Democrat vs. Republican espewed by talk show hosts whom are compensated with millions of dollars to get everyone "hot and bothered" by creating dissention. (Continued…)
grap
posted 8/28/09 @ 11:37 PM EST
Sebelius needs a job that doesn't involve humanity.
Post a Comment