Quantcast The Triangle
College Media Network

Americans chose the wrong 'Idol'

Zara Husaini

Issue date: 5/29/09 Section: Ed-Op
  • Print
  • Email
Media Credit: Michael Becker MCT

This past Wednesday night, millions of viewers tuned in to the "American Idol" season-eight finale. It was one of the most discussed television seasons ever; each episode elicited tons of news articles, blog posts and discussion videos - and it was thanks in large part to one standout contestant. Adam Lambert, the 27-year-old California native, certainly garnered more recognition than any other contestant this season with his ineffable confidence, blatant style statements and eerily wide vocal range (have you heard that falsetto?). Lambert quickly emerged as both a judge and crowd favorite.

Knowing "Idol" history, it shouldn't have come as a surprise when Lambert didn't take the crown on the May 20 finale episode - but it still did. Instead, 23-year-old Kris Allen's victory over Lambert was unquestionably the most startling upset in the show's eight-year history, but the phenomenon behind this is certainly not inexplicable.

"Idol" and other shows of its nature are ultimately not a measure of talent or even popularity these days. Rather, they represent cultural differences in our country and the ongoing battle between them. Naturally, the two left standing in this competition seemed to be polar opposites: Kris Allen, the über-Christian, endearingly-humble married college student who flew under the radar for much of the competition, and Adam Lambert, the screechy, "guylinered," sometimes drag queen who oozed star quality and demanded recognition with his black nail polish and over-the-top theatrics.

There are countless explanations behind Allen's victory: his excessively loyal hometown (apparently this area contributed 40 percent of the finale's total votes), the fact that he most probably earned most of conservative second runner-up Danny Gokey's votes, and the fact that Lambert's fans grew too comfortable in their confidence that their favorite was shoo-in to win. However, each contestant represents something much larger about the nature of the voters.

Kris Allen's victory really isn't so shocking after further consideration. After all, he does bare some striking resemblances to last year's Idol champ, David Cook. Both have the respectable acoustic-rock-career potential, low-key confidence and understated styles. Adam Lambert, on the other hand, reminds America of … well, come to think of it, there's no previous contestant to whom we can liken Lambert. There's no previous reality show winner with an ounce of the originality that he possesses, nor is there an artist on the current market with a similar sound. It seems as though the tendency to reject the unfamiliar is a big part of the American way.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 11

Susan L

posted 5/29/09 @ 8:14 AM EST

Zara,

I think your piece is one of the best pieces of analysis on this subject I have seen (and I am one of the many who are reading ALOT on the subject this week!). (Continued…)

Linda

posted 5/29/09 @ 8:22 AM EST

Thanks for a great article. I completely agree with you. America did choose the wrong winner and just proves the fact that America is not as progressive as they think they are. (Continued…)

leigh

posted 5/29/09 @ 8:24 AM EST

Definitely agree the wrong winner was chosen. When it comes to talent, Adam and Kris are oceans apart. Kris is sweet and has a pleasant voice while Adam explodes on the stage and his charisma, voice and star quality. (Continued…)

tw123

posted 5/29/09 @ 9:45 AM EST

I really liked your article and couldn't agree with you more. We, Americans, chose a wrong idol for all the wrong reasons. To me, AI is not just another reality show; it represents our culture in many ways, which is exactly why it made me worried when its outcome was wrong and all for the wrong reasons. (Continued…)

Coral

posted 5/29/09 @ 9:50 AM EST

For a "junior majoring in communication" Zara has written the most sensible and erudite analysis of "Idol-ness".

Adam's talent is so enormous it is confronting. (Continued…)

tw123

twsprt

posted 5/29/09 @ 9:53 AM EST

I really liked your article and couldn't agree with you more. We, Americans, chose a wrong idol for all the wrong reasons. To me, AI is not just another reality show; it represents our culture in many ways, which is exactly why it made me worried when its outcome was wrong and all for the wrong reasons. (Continued…)

AdamFan

posted 5/29/09 @ 12:41 PM EST

I agree 100% with your assessment that "America" chose the wrong Idol, for all the wrong reasons. I'm really curious how the results would have been different if they had gone to a one phone line, one vote model. (Continued…)

Dyg

posted 5/29/09 @ 1:28 PM EST

The AI is Kris Allen, but Adam is the International Idol. Adam is now a STAR in all countries of the world as we can see on the different pages created by his fans, and also on the official page: http://www. (Continued…)

Lubna Hassan

posted 5/31/09 @ 11:27 AM EST

Great Analysis Zara. I think you're absolutely right when you say shows like this dont only speak about talent but so much beyond that. It's about how the country would want to look at their idol and it's sad that when so much emphasis is being laid on talent, on the very last note - talent loses out to social acceptance. (Continued…)

Catherine

posted 5/31/09 @ 10:35 PM EST

Very articulate, well written and most of all, very correct. Most of the mainstream newspapers should take a lesson from you.

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.



Triangle Video Section: Use the arrows to select different videos.

Advertisement

Poll

Is the death penalty ever a justifiable punishment?

Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement