Quantcast The Triangle
College Media Network

The Yowie: Australian for 'unlikely'

By: Aaron Sakulich

Issue date: 3/2/07 Section: Ed-Op
Originally published: 3/2/07 at 10:23 AM EST
Last update: 3/2/07 at 10:23 AM EST
  • Print
  • Email
Hardly a week goes by without my being totally stultified by some new zoological discovery. A few weeks ago, researchers discovered a breeding ground for giant squid, which means that they're about a million times braver than I am. If I were in a submarine and I saw even a single giant squid, I would turn around and, in a word, flee. Especially if I were faced with a monstrosity recently mentioned on the BBC: a squid that emits a bright flash of light from its tentacles in order to confuse prey. Sadly, I have yet to hear any new news on an Australian creature known as the Yowie.

The Yowie is a creature not unlike our North American Bigfoot: between five and eight feet tall, covered with long, dirty hair, and although many people who "spot" the creature first think it to be a monkey, it has distinctly, unmistakably human features. Calling it similar to Bigfoot is somewhat an act of charity; it has more in common with the Puerto Rican Chupacabra. That's sort of a negative thing; what I mean is that nobody can agree on what it looks like. Ranging from five to eight feet tall, it may or may not have glowing eyes of a range of colors, it has been reported with dark or light brown hair, and between three and five fingers (or claws) on the hands and feet. It is sometimes described as peaceful, sometimes as extraordinarily violent, may or may not be associated with a horrible smell, so on and so forth. Not only that, but there are also reports of Yowies that are much shorter, around three feet, though the Aboriginal peoples of Australia insist that these are not just young Yowies, but rather a separate breed entirely that they call Jujudees.

Is it possible that such a creature exists? Australia has a lot of unexplored areas in which plenty of nightmare creatures could conceal themselves. To answer this question, we have to draw a distinction between the regular, flesh-and-blood Yowie and what we might as well call the psychic space Yowie.

Like the Chupacabra, no one can agree on the Yowie's origins. Some claim that it is just a large, unpleasant animal, like the giant squid, that we've not yet discovered. Others, however, claim either that the Yowie is from outer space or that it has some sort of psychic ghost powers.
Page 1 of 3 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 8

Ian Westray

posted 3/03/07 @ 7:29 AM EST

"Stultify": cause to lose enthusiasm and initiative, esp. as a result of a tedious or restritive routine.

"Stupefy": astonish and shock.

Aaron Sakulich

posted 3/03/07 @ 9:50 AM EST

I meant it more along the lines of "prove to be of unsound mind or demonstrate someone's incompetence". BY which I mean, the ridiculous stuff that they keep dragging out of the ocean makes me feel like an idiot for thinking we'd had most of the hideous beasties figured out. (Continued…)

Jon-Erik Beckjord

posted 3/03/07 @ 2:47 PM EST

You are correct, there is no yowie or bigfoot on a flesh and blood
basis.

However, there are creatures who "visit" us as space-time beings.
Some are aliens, some are yowies. (Continued…)

beckjord

e beckjord

posted 3/03/07 @ 2:54 PM EST

1) we have photos of Bigfoot that are new.
2) it and yowie are space-time beings. Under quantum mechanics.
3) as a student, why didn't you figure that out?
4) registering here is a long pain in the xxx. (Continued…)

t'mara carson

posted 3/03/07 @ 11:11 PM EST

please take a step back and realize there is a TOTAL LACK of EVIDENCE regarding ANYTHING bigfoot. So the idea that bigfoot is a paranormal creature is no more preposterous than the idea that bigfoot exists at all. (Continued…)

NedKelly

NedKelly

posted 3/04/07 @ 10:35 PM EST

I'm astonished you would ridicule someone who is mentally ill. (By the way, those concerned with the dignity of the mentally ill find "lunatic" offensive. (Continued…)

Aaron Sakulich

posted 3/06/07 @ 5:53 PM EST

In reverse order:

Ned, Doctors have not used the term lunatic to describe an exact medical state since the forties, when it was changed to "person of unsound mind. (Continued…)

T'mara

posted 3/15/07 @ 11:30 PM EST

re. your comments... you will note that i did not call the sasquatch a "monster."... that implies that it is a distortion...like a comic book creation or worst still a character of a fantasy game. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.



Triangle Video Section: Use the arrows to select different videos.

Advertisement

Poll

Is the death penalty ever a justifiable punishment?

Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement