Quantcast The Triangle
College Media Network

The Yowie: Australian for 'unlikely'

By: Aaron Sakulich

Issue date: 3/2/07 Section: Ed-Op
Originally published: 3/2/07 at 10:23 AM EST
Last update: 3/2/07 at 10:23 AM EST
  • Print
  • Email
This tale is utter madness. Yowies that attack him in the middle of the night? Perpetual motion machines? Invisible footprint-making monsters chasing him off a cliff? UFO-controlled auto accidents? To those who are attempting to find the Yowie, working on the theory that it is just a big, ugly animal we've not seen before, I feel only pure, undiluted sympathy. This story is, at best, the ravings of a lunatic.

On the other hand, perhaps not all of the researchers deserve sympathy. The same site has an article written by a journalist who went out for a night with an experienced Yowie hunter. They crept through the brush, hearing the sounds of Yowies yelling back and forth to each other, before they decided to change positions. Going down a different backwoods path, they were startled to see a Yowie with glowing red eyes step onto the path in front of them. The journalist writes that the creature was amazing, and we'll have to take his word for it, because the pair had for some reason left their camera in the car.

Seems a bit on the convenient side, doesn't it?

I mean, a man knows so much about Yowie activity that he can just pick an area, show up one evening, and not just hear a handful of them communicating, but actually see one at close range. As easy as spotting a guy in an Eagles jersey in Philadelphia. And yet, not a single photograph or sound recording has ever been made. At least there's the occasional blurry shot of Bigfoot going through someone's trash; the only thing that the Yowie has going for it is a handful of plaster casts of supposed footprints. (Footprints, for the record, are easier to forge than photographs.)

The Yowie researchers also have a bit of the anti-government paranoia that has infected the UFO community ever since the Air Force made it clear that they didn't want the Soviets to have any advantage over them. Unproven, unprovable claims, such as that young police officers do not report Yowie cases due to fear of ridicule, or that there is an active government cover-up of the phenomenon, spatter otherwise sane-sounding monster hunting.

That's the short version of the Yowie story. I'm not an expert on them. I can't even find Australia on a map. But I hope that the Yowie enthusiast community won't hold it against me to say that, although the existence of such a creature is theoretically possible, I don't believe in it. The total lack of evidence, the lunacy of the UFO ghost psychic phantom gibberish with which your research is associated, and the questionably convenient reports of some of your colleagues are giant, bold, red strikes against you.

Be seeing you.
< prev Page 3 of 3

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 8

Ian Westray

posted 3/03/07 @ 7:29 AM EST

"Stultify": cause to lose enthusiasm and initiative, esp. as a result of a tedious or restritive routine.

"Stupefy": astonish and shock.

Aaron Sakulich

posted 3/03/07 @ 9:50 AM EST

I meant it more along the lines of "prove to be of unsound mind or demonstrate someone's incompetence". BY which I mean, the ridiculous stuff that they keep dragging out of the ocean makes me feel like an idiot for thinking we'd had most of the hideous beasties figured out. (Continued…)

Jon-Erik Beckjord

posted 3/03/07 @ 2:47 PM EST

You are correct, there is no yowie or bigfoot on a flesh and blood
basis.

However, there are creatures who "visit" us as space-time beings.
Some are aliens, some are yowies. (Continued…)

beckjord

e beckjord

posted 3/03/07 @ 2:54 PM EST

1) we have photos of Bigfoot that are new.
2) it and yowie are space-time beings. Under quantum mechanics.
3) as a student, why didn't you figure that out?
4) registering here is a long pain in the xxx. (Continued…)

t'mara carson

posted 3/03/07 @ 11:11 PM EST

please take a step back and realize there is a TOTAL LACK of EVIDENCE regarding ANYTHING bigfoot. So the idea that bigfoot is a paranormal creature is no more preposterous than the idea that bigfoot exists at all. (Continued…)

NedKelly

NedKelly

posted 3/04/07 @ 10:35 PM EST

I'm astonished you would ridicule someone who is mentally ill. (By the way, those concerned with the dignity of the mentally ill find "lunatic" offensive. (Continued…)

Aaron Sakulich

posted 3/06/07 @ 5:53 PM EST

In reverse order:

Ned, Doctors have not used the term lunatic to describe an exact medical state since the forties, when it was changed to "person of unsound mind. (Continued…)

T'mara

posted 3/15/07 @ 11:30 PM EST

re. your comments... you will note that i did not call the sasquatch a "monster."... that implies that it is a distortion...like a comic book creation or worst still a character of a fantasy game. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.



Triangle Video Section: Use the arrows to select different videos.

Advertisement

Poll

Are you excited for 3D television programs?

Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement