United Nations corrupt, uncooperative, ineffective
The Leauge of Nations failed once, and it has failed again under new management; change is needed
James Mack, Jr.
Issue date: 10/8/04 Section: Ed-Op
Similarly, Somalia in 1993 was a brewing pot for disorder and chaos, with innocent civilians caught in the middle. While the United Nations started sending food into the country to feed its starving citizens, greedy warlords intercepted this food and pillaged it for their own use. The United Nations was then attacked by the clan of warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid, and the UN immediately withdrew from the region, leaving only the Americans behind. Instead of being bullied and leaving with a black eye, the military decided to fight back to allow citizens access to food. It was our soldiers who paid the price for that food, and it was our soldiers who were dragged through the streets mercilessly by insurgents. The United Nations contributed nothing, and if it weren't for the United States and their willingness to act, the country of Somalia would have endured more pain, suffering and starvation than humans should ever experience.
The U.N. has their own little plan for the United States on their plate. They have repeatedly supported calls for the ban of small arms by all citizens in member countries. Never mind the 2nd Amendment implications domestically, but to force all citizens in the United States to give up their civil rights because the United Nations says so is ludicrous. Countries wishing to enslave and overpower their citizens have always demanded gun forfeiture and gun registration so that their population is controlled like caged animals. Look at Washington, D.C., a city where they banned all handguns from ownership and banned their sale. Their crime rate has increasingly become one of the highest in the nation, surpassing seven times the national average. Now, because the United Nations doesn't like firearms, we should disarm everybody in the country? Listening to the senile United Nations is not only directly contradicting our sovereignty, it's detrimental to our health and safety.
If you want to obey Senator Kerry's "Global Test," fine. If you want the United Nations to annex the United States of America, as their resolutions have tried, fine. But do not think for a second that we will ever be able to make decisions on our own again. It is a slippery slope to consistently bow to international pressure and make secondary our right to self defense. The United Nations employs Hamas, makes deals with Saddam and gets bullied around by him for 13 years, and they allow no room for sovereignty of respectful nations. Continuing our relationship and obeying their rules would violate our Constitution. Continuing our relationship would allow more corruption and under the table deals to flow through the United States. There is no hope for this organization. If we are to retain some dignity for ourselves, we must resign from this organization forthwith and let the thing collapse. It is the League of Nations, and the proverbial Old Yeller - time to put it down.
James Mack, Jr. is a junior majoring in criminal justice.
The U.N. has their own little plan for the United States on their plate. They have repeatedly supported calls for the ban of small arms by all citizens in member countries. Never mind the 2nd Amendment implications domestically, but to force all citizens in the United States to give up their civil rights because the United Nations says so is ludicrous. Countries wishing to enslave and overpower their citizens have always demanded gun forfeiture and gun registration so that their population is controlled like caged animals. Look at Washington, D.C., a city where they banned all handguns from ownership and banned their sale. Their crime rate has increasingly become one of the highest in the nation, surpassing seven times the national average. Now, because the United Nations doesn't like firearms, we should disarm everybody in the country? Listening to the senile United Nations is not only directly contradicting our sovereignty, it's detrimental to our health and safety.
If you want to obey Senator Kerry's "Global Test," fine. If you want the United Nations to annex the United States of America, as their resolutions have tried, fine. But do not think for a second that we will ever be able to make decisions on our own again. It is a slippery slope to consistently bow to international pressure and make secondary our right to self defense. The United Nations employs Hamas, makes deals with Saddam and gets bullied around by him for 13 years, and they allow no room for sovereignty of respectful nations. Continuing our relationship and obeying their rules would violate our Constitution. Continuing our relationship would allow more corruption and under the table deals to flow through the United States. There is no hope for this organization. If we are to retain some dignity for ourselves, we must resign from this organization forthwith and let the thing collapse. It is the League of Nations, and the proverbial Old Yeller - time to put it down.
James Mack, Jr. is a junior majoring in criminal justice.



Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 17
serife
posted 3/11/07 @ 8:22 AM EST
heloo i have an assignmet to do about the UN and i have to prove that its ineffective in its mission
can u please send me some infomation or give me a web adress
tx
Alex
posted 3/17/07 @ 4:46 PM EST
Hi I have to do an essay on how the UN is ineffective, can you please send me some info, online sources, or maybe the titles of some good books that I can use? thanks
Pat
posted 4/04/07 @ 10:52 PM EST
Hi,
I also have an assignment where I need to argue for the UN being ineffective in meeting its goals. However, this will be in a debate so I need quick snappy points. (Continued…)
Philip
posted 5/08/07 @ 10:10 PM EST
Hi,
as funny as it seems I as well have an assignment on the ineffectiveness of the UN. Could you please send me some info if you have it, or perhaps some important points?
Thanks so much
searching for the truth
posted 10/02/07 @ 7:16 PM EST
hello
can you send me some informations regarding the ineffectiveness of the UN?
Dino Man
posted 10/27/07 @ 7:39 PM EST
Hi, I am working on a research paper to prove that the security council of United Nation is currently ineffective, could you please send me some info or introduce some good books that would help. (Continued…)
Jewke
posted 11/21/07 @ 8:03 PM EST
Hi, I have an assignment that I have to do. Can you send me some -- just kidding.
Dr A
posted 1/08/08 @ 6:21 PM EST
Great article. But the snake of corruption goes much deeper than addressed in this article. I am convinced that the corrupt leadership of most of the world's nations, especially Europe (esp the royal families), the USA, and China are involved in the global government/organized crime elite as are other powers. (Continued…)
Nadia
posted 5/03/08 @ 1:32 AM EST
Hi there, I as well am writing an essay headed "the UN is inefficent and obsolete, discuss." I really enjoyed reading your essay and would love if you could send me some info as well as well. (Continued…)
Jesse
posted 5/06/08 @ 10:30 PM EST
I seem to be in the same boat as many others. Could I also get some links for an assignment
Post a Comment