Quantcast The Triangle
College Media Network

Michael Moore propagates fury through distortion

By: James Mack, Jr.

Issue date: 6/25/04 Section: Ed-Op
Originally published: 6/24/04 at 9:41 PM EST
Last update: 6/24/04 at 9:42 PM EST
  • Print
  • Email
Columnist Aaron Sakulich ("Michael Moore's works a travesty to documentaries," The Triangle, May 28, p. 15) succinctly explained and proved Moore was a liar. However, Brad Levinson's commentary in response ("Sakulich misrepresents Moore's documentaries," The Triangle, June 4, p. 16) used the exact same tactics as Moore to rebut the argument. Levinson did not tackle any issues himself, rather, he used circular arguments and his own half-truths. It is more than apparent that Levinson is blind and ignorant to what Moore has done, and he cannot ascertain the depth to which Moore has led him on.

In his article, Levinson said, "Michael Moore may be over the top, but at least he's not a liar."

I think that perfectly sums up Levinson's level of understanding about the true nature of Moore. A dangerous threat to our Constitutional Republic as a political system is a uniformed and misguided voter. The "drive-by voter" is not necessarily someone who is dumb, but someone who is wrapped in an environment where they are told mendacities and believe them. The point of a free society is for people to be responsibly informed. While you may like or dislike the president of the United States, do not make the mistake of basing your disagreements with his policies on Moore's twisted interpretation of reality. Moore's duplicity is an infection, a disease that has already ravaged Hollywood and the media alike. However, it is not too late for college students. Forming your own opinions through true facts and figures, and even aligning yourself with the Democrats or Republicans, is infinitely better than believing the word of someone who's track record is indiscernible from that of Joseph Goebbels.



James Mack Jr. is a junior majoring in criminal justice. His favorite phrase is "Michael Moore ist verbatten."
< prev Page 3 of 3

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 8

stevezzzz

stevezzzz

posted 6/25/04 @ 5:56 PM EST

James,

Your argument is baseless and boring. You obviously have not seen F. 9/11, which is a brilliant defensible polemic designed to spark controversy which will be followed by conversation. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

stevezzzz

stevezzzz

posted 6/28/04 @ 3:15 PM EST

James,

You reply to my comment speaks for itself. You are not accepting my challenge to explicitly expose the lies of F9/11.
That should be easy. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

stevezzzz

stevezzzz

posted 6/29/04 @ 3:16 AM EST

The most important work Moore's film accomplishes is getting people to question what the "news outlets" have told them.

James,
Thanks for taking the time to voice your views publicly. (Continued…)

ArFil

ArFil

posted 7/01/04 @ 11:33 AM EST

James,

I just wanted to refute some of the republican rethoric that you preach:

>James Mack wrote:
>
>Moore claims that the economy is slipping and doing >poorly. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

stevezzzz

stevezzzz

posted 7/07/04 @ 3:01 AM EST

It's easy to argue over numbers, yet the numbers are just as subjective as Michael Moore's polemic. Why the resistance to philosophy?

Stevie Z.

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.



Triangle Video Section: Use the arrows to select different videos.

Advertisement

Poll

Are you excited for 3D television programs?

Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement