Quantcast The Triangle
College Media Network

Michael Moore propagates fury through distortion

By: James Mack, Jr.

Issue date: 6/25/04 Section: Ed-Op
Originally published: 6/24/04 at 9:41 PM EST
Last update: 6/24/04 at 9:42 PM EST
  • Print
  • Email
The interviewing of three truant Canadian schoolchildren is a fine example of misrepresenting views in Bowling for Columbine. These three children seem to have a pretty in-depth understanding of United States' foreign policy, and I believe they hold Ph.Ds in macroeconomics and political science. This thick sarcasm is in regards to a statement made by the morbidly obese girl with stylish blue hair.

"I just think the States, their, their view of things is fighting. That's how they resolve everything. If there's something going on in another country, they, ya know, they send people over to fight it."

Canada entered World War I three years before the United States did and entered World War II two years before our inclusion. But they are right, we resort to war for everything, ya know? Since this interview has absolutely nothing to do with anything in the movie, Moore included it to show that America is viewed as barbaric by these future Colin Powells in Canada. It is immensely effective, if you ask me.

Moore's uncanny ability to launch baseless attacks does not stop at the theater's door. When the war in Iraq was going "poorly," he stated that he hoped more American servicemen came back from the country in coffins to make people realize the "mistake." Tell you what, Michael, say that to the families of those brave men and women. Say that to the free Iraqi people. Tell them it was a mistake to liberate them and remove the threat of Saddam Hussein from the country forever. It's a real mistake that the children can now learn in a free society, and it's a travesty people can openly express their opinions. Moore's misguided and reckless statements have no basis, and he just says it to garner support of a base group he already has - the extremist left.

After all of these lies that I have exposed, how does Moore manage to gain the support of movie stars? To put it bluntly, he has targeted a group that knows as much about politics as they do about their own endocrine systems. Observing Madonna wax politics is about as funny as watching a dingo in a day care center. Moore appeals to the same wealthy class he belongs to and berates. Do you think he time-shares his $1.2 million apartment? How about all of his earnings? Certainly, he must donate everything but $50,000 a year so that he can remain with his middle class brethren. Wait, he would do that if he weren't a habitual, hypocritical liar. It is no surprise that the Hollywood crowd loves Moore's movies, because their dream worlds are as unrealistic as Moore's exaggerations.
< prev Page 2 of 3 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 8

stevezzzz

stevezzzz

posted 6/25/04 @ 5:56 PM EST

James,

Your argument is baseless and boring. You obviously have not seen F. 9/11, which is a brilliant defensible polemic designed to spark controversy which will be followed by conversation. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

stevezzzz

stevezzzz

posted 6/28/04 @ 3:15 PM EST

James,

You reply to my comment speaks for itself. You are not accepting my challenge to explicitly expose the lies of F9/11.
That should be easy. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

stevezzzz

stevezzzz

posted 6/29/04 @ 3:16 AM EST

The most important work Moore's film accomplishes is getting people to question what the "news outlets" have told them.

James,
Thanks for taking the time to voice your views publicly. (Continued…)

ArFil

ArFil

posted 7/01/04 @ 11:33 AM EST

James,

I just wanted to refute some of the republican rethoric that you preach:

>James Mack wrote:
>
>Moore claims that the economy is slipping and doing >poorly. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

stevezzzz

stevezzzz

posted 7/07/04 @ 3:01 AM EST

It's easy to argue over numbers, yet the numbers are just as subjective as Michael Moore's polemic. Why the resistance to philosophy?

Stevie Z.

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.



Triangle Video Section: Use the arrows to select different videos.

Advertisement

Poll

Is the death penalty ever a justifiable punishment?

Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement